« Home | (GT)4 is the lonliest number » | Xbox.com - TriXie: interviews the Frag Dolls » | Mizuguchi's newest - Lumines for PSP » | Red vs. Blue - a rockin Friday » | l'shanah tovah » | Hotmail is makin me H-O-T-T » | Anyone still need gmail? » | Pocket Kingdom recap » | Squares 2: by Gavin Shapiro » | New competition set »
"Those tubes became a critical exhibit in the administration's brief against Iraq. As the only physical evidence the United States could brandish of Mr. Hussein's revived nuclear ambitions, they gave credibility to the apocalyptic imagery invoked by President Bush and his advisers. The tubes were 'only really suited for nuclear weapons programs,' Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, explained on CNN on Sept. 8, 2002. 'We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.'
But almost a year before, Ms. Rice's staff had been told that the government's foremost nuclear experts seriously doubted that the tubes were for nuclear weapons, according to four officials at the Central Intelligence Agency and two senior administration officials, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity. The experts, at the Energy Department, believed the tubes were likely intended for small artillery rockets. "
[via
The New York Times]
LOL...AL tubes = "Clear and present danger" but
lost nuke = "probably harmless"?
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/09/13/lost.bomb/
(I like the "classic" line)...
"An Air Force investigation concluded in 2001 that the bomb is probably harmless if left where it is. It also said a recovery operation could set off the conventional explosives in the bomb that would put the recovery crew at risk and do serious environmental damage."
Posted by
mrdeath |
7:38 PM, October 05, 2004